Argument-Based Policy Consultation Through Crowd Sourcing
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper describes an on-going project investigating the use of crowdsourcing in policy consultation. We see this as particularly useful in the early consultation stages (e.g. White Paper) when the opinions of the public are sought to determine policy objectives. The project involves a number of discrete stages: thus far we have looked especially at question design, the generation of suitable test data and the suitability of various aggregation algorithms. On the basis of these results we can design software to collect opinions, and generate arguments. The test data will allow the arguments to be evaluated with respect to variously composed populations.
منابع مشابه
NOMAD: Linguistic Resources and Tools Aimed at Policy Formulation and Validation
The NOMAD project (Policy Formulation and Validation through non Moderated Crowd-sourcing) is a project that supports policy making, by providing rich, actionable information related to how citizens perceive different policies. NOMAD automatically analyzes citizen contributions to the informal web (e.g. forums, social networks, blogs, newsgroups and wikis) using a variety of tools. These tools ...
متن کاملDesign Uncertainty in Crowd-Sourcing Systems
Crowd-sourcing social computing systems represent a new material for HCI designers. Crowd sourcing has been successfully applied to many areas, but these systems are difficult to reliably design and prototype. One source of uncertainty during design is the behavior of the crowd at different levels of scale. A second source of uncertainty during design is the crowd’s response to differing incent...
متن کاملUsing Expertise for Crowd-Sourcing
In this paper, we examine whether the use of expertise ratings can help crowd-sourcing systems. We show, using simulations, that a crowd-sourcing system based in social navigation works better when users’ expertise levels are taken into account.
متن کاملThe Wisdom of Crowds in Government 2.0: Information Paradigm Evolution toward Wiki-Government
This essay, exploring the peer-to-peer collaborative atmosphere penetrating Wikivism, crowd-sourcing and open-source movement, identifies a new paradigm of public information as evolution toward Wiki-government. Citizen participants can collectively create public information via various platforms enabled by Web 2.0 technologies. Under the new participatory paradigm that a large number of indivi...
متن کاملFocus Annotation of Task-based Data: Establishing the Quality of Crowd Annotation
We explore the annotation of information structure in German and compare the quality of expert annotation with crowdsourced annotation taking into account the cost of reaching crowd consensus. Concretely, we discuss a crowd-sourcing effort annotating focus in a task-based corpus of German containing reading comprehension questions and answers. Against the backdrop of a gold standard reference r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014